data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc029/cc029a6beb6e0759481ba7a6d95cece0c91dd1fe" alt=""
Risky for a number of reasons, like:
1. How much time did he spend putting this list together? (try more than 10 years, I have been a member longer at IMDB than at Amazon or Hotmail)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0dd39/0dd39c3841e834fb3eca7f3d3ebcf878c96b3f83" alt=""
2. How much time has he spent watching these movies? (someone else needs to figure THAT out)
3. His top rated movies suck! (well, that one has been up for discussion a number of times, so maybe not that risky, but 1118 movies -that's like bearing your soul completely...)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90fd9/90fd965cfbf6fcea3f2ab08096c4a4241eeca376" alt=""
My only beef with IMDB is that it shows a movie's original title,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04e6e/04e6edca75fd09f23164e8a2f30adfde6840c886" alt=""
2 comments:
That is a lot to take in, especially as it's arranged by name and not by rating (although I can see now how to change that).
I'm just off to see Arsenal get beaten by Chelsea at Stamford Bridge.
But Copland is on TV tonight, and given your very high rating of it, I'm going to watch it again.
now, do the same with your music[URL=http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/feature/36737/Staff_List_Top_100_Albums_of_the_1990s]here [/URL]
Post a Comment